Test 2016-05-02-11-3 (CTM 301-March 2000) Summary

Project Information
Project IdentifiersProject ID: 209217
DEA: 080F5404
EFIS: 0800000136
COOP: 081468
DIST-CO-RTE-PM08-RIV-91,15-0.0/13.04, 35.64/45.14
Work DescriptionSR-91 Corridor Improvement Project: Develop approx. 8 miles of tolled express lanes and related improvements within SR 91 between the Riverside/Orange County line and I-15, including transition areas.
Location Description08-RIV-91-0.0/13.04; 12-ORA-91-R14.43/R18.91; 08-RIV-15-35.64/45.14
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date5/2/2016 Sample Unique Key11
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing5/18/2016
Sample typeAcceptance A brief description of the sampleClass 2 Aggregate Subbase
The quantity of what the sample constitutes1 Bag From where was the sample collectedJob Site
First name of sampler or witnessed byScott Last name of sampler or witnessed byPowell
Title of samplerQA Tech Laboratory sample identification6175B
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameUnknown Transportation Laboratory (TL) NumberC 957877
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) FormUnknown Structure unique identifierNot set
Structure nameNot set
Material Information
Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)Unknown
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sampleUnknown The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sampleUnknown
The plant numberUnknown A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedRadio Yard Crusher Stockpile
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledUnknown Primary Aggregate Nominal Size1 inch
The concrete mix design numberUnknown Lot numberNot set
Sublot numberNot set HMA Design ID
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2016-05-02-11
DIME Test ID: 2016-05-02-11-3
Testing Lab: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method of Test for Determining the Resistance "R"; Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2019-10-15
Test Results

How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Md Shahjahan
Date of test: 06/01/2016
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 99 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 88 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 79 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 59 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 44 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 32 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 22 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 15 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 10 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 6 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 89 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 80 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 60 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 44 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 32 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 23 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 15 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 10 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 7 %
R value:79
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 10/15/2019