Summary for Test 2020-04-20-29-10
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 214589 DEA: 020J1604 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 02-PLU-284-0.0/8.3 |
Award Date | 02/11/2020 |
Closeout Date | 10/06/2020 |
Work Description | PLACE HMA (TYPE A), PRECOATED AGGREGATE (SEAL COAT), HMA (LEVELING). |
Location Description | PLUMAS COUNTY NEAR CHILCOOT FROM ROUTE 70 TO 1 MILE NORTH OF LITTLE LAST CHANCE CREEK BRIDGE NUMBER 09-0072 |
QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 01/22/2020) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 04/20/2020 | Sample Unique Key | 29 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 04/21/2020 |
Sample type | Verification | A brief description of the sample | Combined 1/2-inch Type A Untreated Virgin Aggregate |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | JMF Verification | From where was the sample collected | Source |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | Jimmy | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Montana |
Title of sampler | Telephone number of sampler | ||
Laboratory sample identification | D78406F | Linked DIME Sample ID | |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Ward Lake Pit | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 733181 |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
Structure name |
Material Information
Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | 91-18-0008 |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | Unknown | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | Unknown |
The plant number | Unknown | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Lab-Batched from Sized Untreated Aggregate Stockpiles |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Unknown | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 1/2 inch |
The concrete mix design number | JMF 20-04-S1 | Lot number | Unknown |
Sublot number | Unknown | Aggregate Mix Number | Not set |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2020-04-20-29
DIME Test ID: 2020-04-20-29-10
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2020-06-18
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Arthur Mills
Date of test: 06/15/2020
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 16.7 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 26.7 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 0 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 5.5 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 183.8 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 78.3 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 3 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 97 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 1 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 99 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 6/18/2020 ✔