Summary for Test 2021-10-07-83-2

Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 993331
DEA: 023H6904
EFIS: 0218000010
DIST-CO-RTE-PM02-PLU-89-30/R42.1
Award Date11/21/2024
Closeout DateNot set
Work DescriptionALMANOR WEST REHAB - ROADWAY REHABILITATION
Location DescriptionIN PLUMAS COUNTY NEAR CANYON DAM FROM LAKE ALMANOR SPILLWAY TO ROUTE 36.
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 10/14/2021)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date10/07/2021 Sample Unique Key83
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing10/07/2021 Sample typePreliminary
A brief description of the sampleSoil The quantity of what the sample constitutes2 bags for structural section recommendation
From where was the sample collectedJob Site First name of sampler or witnessed byDan
Last name of sampler or witnessed byCurran Title of samplerMREA
Telephone number of sampler Laboratory sample identificationD78952
Linked DIME Sample ID The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameUnknown
Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number897766 Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form
Structure unique identifier Structure name
Bid ItemNot set

Material Information

Material TypeSoil The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample A detailed description of where the material sample was collected02-PLU-89-41.0-45ft RT of CL
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled02 PLU 89

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2021-10-07-83
DIME Test ID: 2021-10-07-83-2
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2021-11-16

Test Results


How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Karen Dorado
Date of test: 10/23/2021
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 94 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 85 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 80 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 72 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 67 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 57 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 51 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 48 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 43 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 34 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 21 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 14.4 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 89 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 83 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 70 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 63 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 58 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 53 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 41 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 26 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 18 %
Horizontal pressure (specimen 1): 0.14 MPa
Displacement (specimen 1): 4.54
Horizontal pressure (specimen 2): 0.15 MPa
Displacement (specimen 2): 4.28
Horizontal pressure (specimen 3): 0.15 MPa
Displacement (specimen 3): 4.45
R value (specimen 1): 79.1
R value (specimen 2): 78.7
R value (specimen 3): 78.1
R value: 79
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 11/16/2021 ✔