Sample Record

Owner Lab

  • CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory

DIME Sample ID 2021-12-03-39

Sample is locked from editing. info

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 212779
DEA: 021H5804
EFIS: 0216000024
DIST-CO-RTE-PM02-PLU-70-58.4/R78.4
Award DateNot set
Closeout DateNot set
Work DescriptionNot set
Location DescriptionNot set
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 01/08/2019)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date12/03/2021 Sample Unique Key39
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing12/06/2021
Sample typePreliminary A brief description of the sample1 bag of soil for use in geogrid embankment design
The quantity of what the sample constitutesExisting soil at 02-PLU-70-58.9 From where was the sample collectedJob Site
First name of sampler or witnessed byScott Last name of sampler or witnessed byLewis
Title of samplerEngineering Geologist Telephone number of sampler(530) 225-3516
Laboratory sample identificationD78983 Linked DIME Sample ID
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameN/A Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number876433
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifier
Structure name

Material Information

Material TypeSoil The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample A detailed description of where the material sample was collected02-PLU-70-58.92 from slope on North side of road, 0 to 0.83 ft. depth
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledIn situ

Submitted Tests

DIME Test IDTest MethodTester NameTesting LabDate TestedSubmitted ByVerified?Release DateTest CommentsActions
2021-12-03-39-1THIS TEST HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED.
CTM 203-February 2008: Mechanical Analysis of Soils
Natalie Rivinius and K. R.DoradoCT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory12/28/2021Darrell Valasek
Yes
01/03/2022THIS TEST HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED.
The 24-hr hydrometer reading was taken at 25-hr. Thus, the 1 micron value may be very slightly low.
2021-12-03-39-2THIS TEST HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED.
CTM 202-November 2011: Method of Test for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates
Darrell ValasekCT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory12/08/2021Darrell Valasek
Yes
01/03/2022THIS TEST HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED.
2021-12-03-39-3THIS TEST HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED.
CTM 204-June 2010: Method of Test for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Soils (Plasticity Index)
Natalie RiviniusCT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory12/15/2021Darrell Valasek
Yes
01/03/2022THIS TEST HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED.
2021-12-03-39-4CTM 202-November 2011: Method of Test for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse AggregatesKaren Rios DoradoCT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory01/08/2022Ward Jenkins
Yes
01/20/2022The presence 1½″ particles in a relatively small sample could cause the percentage of the sample reported passing the coarser sieves to not accurately represent the general population. A few additional or missing large stones can shift the entire gradation up or down proportionately.
2021-12-03-39-5THIS TEST HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED.
CTM 203-February 2008: Mechanical Analysis of Soils
Natalie Rivinius and K. R.DoradoCT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory01/08/2022Ward Jenkins
Yes
01/20/2022THIS TEST HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED.
The presence 1½″ particles in a relatively small sample could cause the percentage of the sample reported passing the coarser sieves to not accurately represent the general population. A few additional or missing large stones can shift the entire gradation up or down proportionately.
2021-12-03-39-6CTM 204-June 2010: Method of Test for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Soils (Plasticity Index)Karen Rios DoradoCT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory01/14/2022Ward Jenkins
Yes
01/20/2022
2021-12-03-39-7CTM 203-February 2008: Mechanical Analysis of SoilsNatalie Rivinius and K. R.DoradoCT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory01/08/2022Ward Jenkins
Yes
01/21/2022The 5 and 1 micron are in reverse order. The correct value is now with each size.