Summary for Test 2020-02-07-18-5
Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 214710 DEA: 051J4704 EFIS: 0517000184 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 05-SB-135-17.3/17.6 |
Award Date | 05/27/2021 |
Closeout Date | 08/17/2022 |
Work Description | BUNNY AVENUE AND NORTH BROADWAY PED IMPROVEMENTS |
Location Description | SANTA BARBARA COUNTY IN SANTA MARIA AT BUNNY AVENUE AND FROM ROEMER WAY TO PREISKER LANE |
QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 02/20/2020) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 02/07/2020 | Sample Unique Key | 18 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 02/07/2020 |
Sample type | Preliminary | A brief description of the sample | Native Basement Soil |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | Unknown | From where was the sample collected | Job Site |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | Jacob | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Berven |
Title of sampler | Telephone number of sampler | ||
Laboratory sample identification | D5 20-D-010 | Linked DIME Sample ID | |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Existing | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
Structure name |
Material Information
Material Type | Soil | The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | Unknown |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | Unknown | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | 3 to 5 feet depth |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Unknown |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2020-02-07-18
DIME Test ID: 2020-02-07-18-5
Testing Lab: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2020-02-18
Test Results
How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Daniel Gingras
Date of test: 02/14/2020
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 98 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 98 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 97 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 96 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 94 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 92 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 89 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 82 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 55 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 22 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 8 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 99 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 98 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 96 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 94 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 91 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 84 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 56 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 22 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 8.2 %
R value: 74
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 2/18/2020 ✔