Summary for Test 2019-05-29-13-9
Test performed: CTM 202-November 2011Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 209695 DEA: 08347704 EFIS: 0800000616 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 08-SBD-SR-58-0/12.9 |
Award Date | 11/10/2017 |
Closeout Date | 01/14/2021 |
Work Description | (Alternative Delivery) The CMGC project will upgrade SR 58 from 2- to 4-lanes in San Bernardino County from the Kern County line to 7.5 miles east of US-395. |
Location Description | SR-58 / 395 Kramer Junction project. In San Bernardino County from the Kern County line to 7.5 miles east of US-395. |
QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 12/01/2017) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 05/29/2019 | Sample Unique Key | 13 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 05/31/2019 |
Sample type | Verification | A brief description of the sample | 1/2 HMA-A-SP R15 |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | PSE 18 bags | From where was the sample collected | Manufacturer |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | Vulcan Oro Grande | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | QC |
Title of sampler | Telephone number of sampler | ||
Laboratory sample identification | 0312A-19 | Linked DIME Sample ID | |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Vulcan Oro Grande | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
Structure name |
Material Information
Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | CALMAT, Lucerne Valley, Oro Grande |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | 1/2 HMA-A-SP R15 | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | 324109 SJR ORO |
The plant number | Unknown | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Belt Cut at Plant |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Unknown | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 1/2 inch |
The concrete mix design number | Unknown | Lot number | Unknown |
Sublot number | Unknown | Aggregate Mix Number | Not set |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2019-05-29-13
DIME Test ID: 2019-05-29-13-9
Testing Lab: CT D08 - Fontana Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 202-November 2011: Method of Test for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates
Test Release Date: 2019-07-03
Test Results
What size aggregate is being tested?: Combined Gradation
Individual or cumulative mass retained on each sieve?: Cumulative Mass Retained
For Combined Gradation only, has the fine aggregate sample been reduced?: No
For Combined Gradation only, use #40 Sieve?: No
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Satish Jain
Date of test: 06/05/2019
Cumulative percent passing the 3 in. sieve: 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve: 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve: 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve: 99 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve: 75 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve: 57 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve: 44 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve: 32 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve: 22 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve: 14 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve: 9 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters): RAP Gradation After Ignition Oven
Test was verified on 7/3/2019 ✔