Summary for Test 2023-08-14-98-7
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 994387 DEA: 023J7704 EFIS: 0222000082 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 02-SIS-96-97.2/103.0 |
Award Date | 12/23/2022 |
Closeout Date | 04/11/2024 |
Work Description | RHMA OVERLAY, REPLACE AC SURFACING, GUARDRAIL AND TRAFFIC STRIPE. |
Location Description | SISKIYOU COUNTY ABOUT 21 MILES EAST OF HORSE CREEK FROM 4.2 MILES EAST OF EMPIRE CREEK BRIDGE TO 0.4 MILE WEST OF ROUTE 263 |
QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 03/28/2023) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 08/14/2023 | Sample Unique Key | 98 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 08/14/2023 |
Sample type | Production Start-Up | A brief description of the sample | Combined Untreated 1/2-inch Type G Aggregate |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | Production Start-Up Evaluation | From where was the sample collected | Manufacturer |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | Joe | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Delgado |
Title of sampler | Telephone number of sampler | ||
Laboratory sample identification | D79324F | Linked DIME Sample ID | |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Tullis — Northstate Asphalt (Redding, CA) | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 841613 |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
Structure name |
Material Information
Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | 91-45-0057:: Shasta Ranch Aggregates (Anderson, CA) |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||
The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Laboratory Batched from Sized Untreated Stockpile Samples | |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 1/2 inch | |
The concrete mix design number | Lot number | ||
Sublot number | Aggregate Mix Number |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2023-08-14-98
DIME Test ID: 2023-08-14-98-7
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2024-02-12
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Josh Ferency
Date of test: 02/08/2024
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 32 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 19 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1.7 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 55.8 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0.6 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 25.4 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 3 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 97 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 2 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 98 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 3 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 97 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters): F&E(5:1)=3%
Test was verified on 2/12/2024 ✔