Summary for Test 2023-07-12-35-3
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 993529 DEA: 11430514 EFIS: 1119000008 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 11-SD-15-R31.3/R37.1 |
Award Date | 05/27/2022 |
Closeout Date | Not set |
Work Description | CRCP, FIBER OPTIC CABLE, AND HMA. |
Location Description | SAN DIEGO COUNTY IN AND NEAR ESCONDIDO FROM 0.2 MILE SOUTH OF ROUTE 15/78 SEPARATION TO 0.5 MILE NORTH OF DEER SPRINGS ROAD OVERCROSSING |
QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 02/07/2022) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 07/12/2023 | Sample Unique Key | 35 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 07/17/2023 |
Sample type | Quality Assurance | A brief description of the sample | 3/4" HMA-A |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | 14 boxes 3 bags | From where was the sample collected | Supplier |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | Ben | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Smith |
Title of sampler | Telephone number of sampler | ||
Laboratory sample identification | 6624-PSU | Linked DIME Sample ID | 2023-07-12-34 |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Martin Marietta | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
Structure name |
Material Information
Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | N/A |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||
The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Plant | |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 3/4 inch | |
The concrete mix design number | Lot number | ||
Sublot number | Aggregate Mix Number |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2023-07-12-35
DIME Test ID: 2023-07-12-35-3
Testing Lab: CT D11 - District 11 Materials Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2023-10-05
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Number
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Daniel Smith
Date of test: 07/21/2023
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 0 %
Number of 6 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 6 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 5 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 5 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ¾ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ¾ inch that were not flat and elongated: 100 particles
Number of ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 3 particles
Number of ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 97 particles
Number of ⅜ inch that were flat and elongated: 5 particles
Number of ⅜ inch that were not flat and elongated: 95 particles
Number of ¼ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ¼ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of No. 4 that were flat and elongated: 2 particles
Number of No. 4 that were not flat and elongated: 98 particles
Percentage (by number) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by number) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 3 %
Percentage (by number) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 97 %
Percentage (by number) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 5 %
Percentage (by number) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 95 %
Percentage (by number) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 2 %
Percentage (by number) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 98 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by number) that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by number) that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 10/5/2023 ✔