Summary for Test 2022-08-24-54-7
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 993505 DEA: 022J4404 EFIS: 0221000078 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 02-LAS-139-38.0/43.0 |
Award Date | 03/07/2022 |
Closeout Date | 05/24/2023 |
Work Description | REPLACE AC SURFACING, ASPHALT RUBBER BINDER, SEAL COAT & HMA OVERLAY. |
Location Description | LASSEN COUNTY ABOUT 37 MILES NORTH OF SUSANVILLE FROM 4.3 MILES NORTH OF SOUTH GRASSHOPPER ROAD TO 0. 2 MILE SOUTH OF TERMO GRASSHOPPER ROAD |
QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 01/18/2022) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 08/24/2022 | Sample Unique Key | 54 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 08/25/2022 |
Sample type | Authorization | A brief description of the sample | 3 bags of Uncoated 3/8-inch Aggregate |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | Process Tests on Aggregate for Use in Asphalt Rubber Binder Chip Seal | From where was the sample collected | Manufacturer |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | Joe | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Delgado |
Title of sampler | Consultant | Telephone number of sampler | |
Laboratory sample identification | D79141 | Linked DIME Sample ID | |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Hat Creek Construction and Materials – Shaw Pit Facility (Lookout, CA) | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 841577 |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
Structure name |
Material Information
Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | 91-25-0008::Shaw Pit |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||
The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Stockpile | |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 1/2 inch | |
The concrete mix design number | Lot number | ||
Sublot number | Aggregate Mix Number | Not set |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2022-08-24-54
DIME Test ID: 2022-08-24-54-7
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2022-09-02
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Karen Dorado
Date of test: 08/30/2022
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 22 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 58 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 18 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1.7 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 200.3 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 114.8 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 1.6 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 47.5 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 99 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 99 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 3 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 97 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 1 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 99 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 9/2/2022 ✔