Summary for Test 2022-07-11-81-7

Test performed: ASTM D4791-10

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 993345
DEA: 022J4004
EFIS: 0221000074
DIST-CO-RTE-PM02-LAS-395-56.5/R61.1
Award Date02/02/2022
Closeout Date11/23/2022
Work DescriptionCOLD PLANE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT AND PLACE HMA.
Location DescriptionLASSEN COUNTY NEAR JANESVILLE FROM 0.1 MILE NORTH OF SUNNYSIDE ROAD TO 0.1 MILE NORTH OF ROUTE 36
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 11/01/2021)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date07/11/2022 Sample Unique Key81
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing07/14/2022
Sample typeAcceptance A brief description of the sampleCombined Untreated 1/2-inch Virgin Aggregate
The quantity of what the sample constitutesProduction Start-Up Evaluation From where was the sample collectedManufacturer
First name of sampler or witnessed byCGI Last name of sampler or witnessed by.
Title of samplerConsultant Telephone number of sampler
Laboratory sample identificationD79090F Linked DIME Sample ID
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameHat Creek Construction and Materials – Ward Lake Plant (Litchfield, CA) Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number894728
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifier
Structure name

Material Information

Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site)91-18-0008::Ward Lake Pit
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample
The plant number A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedLaboratory Batched from Untreated Sized Virgin Aggregate Stockpile Samples
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled Primary Aggregate Nominal Size1/2 inch
The concrete mix design number Lot number
Sublot number Aggregate Mix NumberNot set

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2022-07-11-81
DIME Test ID: 2022-07-11-81-7
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2022-08-15

Test Results


Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles

Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Khue Yang
Date of test: 08/08/2022
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 13.2 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 37.9 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 11.9 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 3.2 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 307.8 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 11.8 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 169.5 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 3.6 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 54.3 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 99 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 7 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 93 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 6 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 94 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 6 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 94 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 8/15/2022