Summary for Test 2021-12-03-43-2

Test performed: CTM 203-February 2008

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 212779
DEA: 021H5804
EFIS: 0216000024
Award DateNot set
Closeout DateNot set
Work DescriptionNot set
Location DescriptionNot set
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 01/08/2019)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date12/03/2021 Sample Unique Key43
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing12/06/2021
Sample typePreliminary A brief description of the sample1 bag of soil for use in geogrid embankment design
The quantity of what the sample constitutesExisting soil at 02-PLU-70-77.6 From where was the sample collectedJob Site
First name of sampler or witnessed byScott Last name of sampler or witnessed byLewis
Title of samplerEngineering Geologist Telephone number of sampler(530) 225-3516
Laboratory sample identificationD78988 Linked DIME Sample ID
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameN/A Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number876438
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifier
Structure name

Material Information

Material TypeSoil The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample A detailed description of where the material sample was collected02-PLU-70-77.63 from toe of slope on North side of road, 0 to 0.83 ft. depth
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledIn situ

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2021-12-03-43
DIME Test ID: 2021-12-03-43-2
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 203-February 2008: Mechanical Analysis of Soils
Test Release Date: 2022-01-21

Test Results

What size aggregate is being tested?: Combined Gradation
Individual or cumulative mass retained on each sieve?: Cumulative Mass Retained
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Karen Rios Dorado
Date of test: 01/14/2022
Cumulative percent passing the 3 in. sieve:100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 1/2 in. sieve:100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve:100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve:92 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve:90 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve:89 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve:88 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve:88 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve:86 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve:76 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve:56 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve:37 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve:23 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve:13 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve:7 %
Cumulative Percent Passing on 1 Micron:1 %
Cumulative Percent Passing on 5 Microns:2 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters): The presence 1½″ particles in a relatively small sample could cause the percentage of the sample reported passing the coarser sieves to not accurately represent the general population. A few additional or missing large stones can shift the entire gradation up or down proportionately.

Test was verified on 1/21/2022