Summary for Test 2021-12-03-40-1

Test performed: CTM 203-February 2008
Warning: The test results shown on this page have been superseded and are invalid. This information is for reference only. Please click this link to view the corrected test.

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 212779
DEA: 021H5804
EFIS: 0216000024
Award DateNot set
Closeout DateNot set
Work DescriptionNot set
Location DescriptionNot set
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 01/08/2019)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date12/03/2021 Sample Unique Key40
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing12/06/2021
Sample typePreliminary A brief description of the sample1 bag of soil for use in geogrid embankment design
The quantity of what the sample constitutesExisting soil at 02-PLU-70-63.1 From where was the sample collectedJob Site
First name of sampler or witnessed byScott Last name of sampler or witnessed byLewis
Title of samplerEngineering Geologist Telephone number of sampler(530) 225-3516
Laboratory sample identificationD78984 Linked DIME Sample ID
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameN/A Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number876434
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifier
Structure name

Material Information

Material TypeSoil The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample A detailed description of where the material sample was collected02-PLU-70-63.08 from face of slope on North side of road
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledIn situ

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2021-12-03-40
DIME Test ID: 2021-12-03-40-1
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 203-February 2008: Mechanical Analysis of Soils
Test Release Date: 2022-01-03

Test Results

What size aggregate is being tested?: Combined Gradation
Individual or cumulative mass retained on each sieve?: Cumulative Mass Retained
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Natalie Rivinius
Date of test: 12/28/2021
Cumulative percent passing the 3 in. sieve:100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 1/2 in. sieve:100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve:100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve:95 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve:93 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve:92 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve:90 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve:89 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve:86 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve:80 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve:75 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve:71 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve:65 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve:57 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve:50 %
Cumulative Percent Passing on 1 Micron:16 %
Cumulative Percent Passing on 5 Microns:28 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 1/3/2022

Warning: The test results shown on this page have been superseded and are invalid. This information is for reference only.