Summary for Test 2020-10-29-29-10
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 214515 DEA: 024F6004 EFIS: 0213000012 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 02-SIS,TRI-36,96,299-VAR |
Award Date | 01/14/2020 |
Closeout Date | 08/24/2022 |
Work Description | BRIDGE DECK REPAIR, POLYESTER OVERLAY AND RAIL REPLACEMENT. |
Location Description | SISKIYOU AND TRINITY COUNTIES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS |
QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 01/22/2020) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 10/29/2020 | Sample Unique Key | 29 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 10/29/2020 |
Sample type | Verification | A brief description of the sample | 1/2-inch Type A Untreated Virgin Aggreagte |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | JMF Verification | From where was the sample collected | Source |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | NRML | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Redding |
Title of sampler | Telephone number of sampler | ||
Laboratory sample identification | D78689F | Linked DIME Sample ID | |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Mercer-Fraser Company, Willow Creek Plant | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 853340 |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
Structure name |
Material Information
Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | 91-12-0007 |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||
The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Lab-Batched from Sized Untreated Aggregate Stockpiles | |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 1/2 inch | |
The concrete mix design number | JMF 20-11-S3 | Lot number | |
Sublot number | Aggregate Mix Number | Not set |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2020-10-29-29
DIME Test ID: 2020-10-29-29-10
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2021-04-02
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Karen Rios Dorado
Date of test: 12/15/2020
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 12.3 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 26.5 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 13.5 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1.2 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 251.2 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 3.5 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 61.1 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 3.1 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 23.2 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 5 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 95 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 12 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 88 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 6 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 94 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 4/2/2021 ✔