Test 2014-11-18-5-4 (CTM 301-March 2000) Summary

Project Information
Project IdentifiersProject ID: 7427
DEA: 07215934
EFIS: 0700001833
DIST-CO-RTE-PM07-LA-5-2.4/4.0
Work DescriptionWiden and Realign Freeway and Construct Ped OC, OC and UC Structures.
Location DescriptionLOS ANGELES COUNTY IN SANTA FE SPRINGS AND NORWALK FROM 0.1 MILE NORTH OF CARMENITA ROAD OVERCROSSING TO 0.1 MILE NORTH OF SILVERBOW AVENUE PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSING
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date11/18/2014 Sample Unique Key5
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing11/21/2014
Sample typeAcceptance A brief description of the sampleClass 3 Aggregate Base
The quantity of what the sample constitutes2 Bags From where was the sample collectedOther
First name of sampler or witnessed byRamsey Last name of sampler or witnessed byDoumani
Title of samplerUnknown Laboratory sample identification4314B
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameI 15 South Mainline Transportation Laboratory (TL) NumberC671653
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifierNot set
Structure nameNot set
Material Information
Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)Unknown
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sampleUnknown The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sampleUnknown
The plant numberUnknown A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedI 15 South Mainline
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledUnknown Primary Aggregate Nominal Size
The concrete mix design number Lot numberNot set
Sublot numberNot set HMA Design ID
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2014-11-18-5
DIME Test ID: 2014-11-18-5-4
Testing Lab: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method of Test for Determining the Resistance "R"; Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2015-02-23
Test Results

How will the R value be determined?: By expansion pressure
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Vincent Onoh
Date of test: 12/03/2014
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 99 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 99 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 98 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 97 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 94 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 82 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 71 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 53 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 42 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 34 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 26 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 16 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 10 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 5.3 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 87 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 76 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 56 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 45 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 36 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 27 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 17 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 10 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 5.6 %
R value:82
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 250 characters):

Test was verified on 02/23/2015