Test 2014-08-14-31-4 (CTM 301-March 2000) Summary

Project Information
Project IdentifiersProject ID: 209020
DEA: 07288014
EFIS: 0700020957
DIST-CO-RTE-PM07-LA-210-R9.7/R16.1
Work DescriptionREPLACE EXIST PVMT WITH PCC AND HMA AND REPLACE MEDIAN CONC BARRIER.
Location DescriptionLOS ANGELES COUNTY IN LOS ANGELES AND GLENDALE FROM 0.2 MILE WEST OF BIG TUJUNGA WASH BRIDGE TO DUNSMORE AVENUE UNDERCROSSING
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date8/14/2014 Sample Unique Key31
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing8/18/2014
Sample typeAcceptance A brief description of the sampleClass 3 Aggregate Base
The quantity of what the sample constitutes3 Bags From where was the sample collectedOther
First name of sampler or witnessed byRamzy Last name of sampler or witnessed byNabulsi
Title of samplerUnknown Laboratory sample identification4234B
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameEB 210 Sta 610 00 East of Sunland Blvd On Ramp Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifierNot set
Structure nameNot set
Material Information
Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)Unknown
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sampleUnknown The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sampleUnknown
The plant numberUnknown A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedSample was taken at approximately Sta 610 00 from a stockpile where crushing machine was processing
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledUnknown Primary Aggregate Nominal Size
The concrete mix design number Lot numberNot set
Sublot numberNot set HMA Design ID
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2014-08-14-31
DIME Test ID: 2014-08-14-31-4
Testing Lab: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method of Test for Determining the Resistance "R"; Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2015-02-20
Test Results

How will the R value be determined?: By expansion pressure
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Vincent Onoh
Date of test: 08/22/2014
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 97 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 77 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 62 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 41 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 28 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 21 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 16 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 12 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 8 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 5.7 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 79 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 64 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 42 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 29 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 21 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 17 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 12 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 8 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 5.9 %
R value:80
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 02/20/2015