Test 2020-02-03-10-1 (CTM 202-November 2011) Summary
Project Information
| Project Identifiers | Project ID: 214681 DEA: 021H5104 EFIS: 0216000148 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 02-TEH-99-9.0/9.3 | ||
| Work Description | Champlin Slough | ||
| Location Description | Replace Bridge in Tehama County near Los Molinos from 0.2 mile south to 0.2 mile north of Champlin Slough | ||
Sample Information
| Sample Taken Date | 2/3/2020 | Sample Unique Key | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 2/4/2020 |
| Sample type | Preliminary | A brief description of the sample | Soil |
| The quantity of what the sample constitutes | Structural Section Recomendation | From where was the sample collected | Job Site |
| First name of sampler or witnessed by | Brian | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Steiner |
| Title of sampler | AAME | Laboratory sample identification | D78326 |
| The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | In Situ | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 824578 |
| Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
| Structure name |
Material Information
| Material Type | Soil | The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | Unknown |
|---|---|---|---|
| The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | Unknown | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | 02-TEH-99-9.25, Embankment, 0.5 - 1.0 foot Depth |
| Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Unknown |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2020-02-03-10
DIME Test ID: 2020-02-03-10-1
Testing Lab: CT D02 - North Region Materials Lab
Test Method: CTM 202-November 2011: Method of Test for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates
Test Release Date: 2020-02-19
Test Results
What size aggregate is being tested?: Combined Gradation
Individual or cumulative mass retained on each sieve?: Cumulative Mass Retained
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Dennis Hickey
Date of test: 02/05/2020
Total mass of coarse material in the sample: 3905 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the 3 in. sieve: 0 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the 2 1/2 in. sieve: 0 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the 2 in. sieve: 0 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the 1 1/2 in. sieve: 0 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the 1 in. sieve: 583 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the 3/4 in. sieve: 1054 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the 1/2 in. sieve: 2080 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the 3/8 in. sieve: 2627 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the #4 sieve: 3905 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the pan (coarse grain): 3905 grams
Total mass of fine material in the sample: 6979 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the #8 sieve: 66.3 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the #16 sieve: 113.2 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the #30 sieve: 149.9 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the #50 sieve: 182.9 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the #100 sieve: 205.4 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the #200 sieve: 222 grams
Cumulative mass retained on the pan (fine grain): 478.5 grams
Mass of all coarse aggregate: 3905 grams
Mass of all fine aggregate: 478.5 grams
Percentage of coarse material: 36 %
Percentage of fine material: 64 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3 in. sieve:100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 1/2 in. sieve:100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve:100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve:100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve:95 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve:90 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve:81 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve:76 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve:64 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve:55 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve:49 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve:44 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve:40 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve:37 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve:34 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters): End result is correct. Fields are poorly named. It is not clear which values are desired in some fields.
Test was verified on 02/19/2020 ✔