Test 2019-08-02-21-6 (CTM 301-March 2000) Summary

Project Information
Project IdentifiersProject ID: 213551
DEA: 080K2934
EFIS: 0812000100
DIST-CO-RTE-PM08-SBD-10-R36.8/R39.2
Work DescriptionPAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND CONTINUOUSLY REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT
Location DescriptionSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY IN YUCAIPA FROM 0.2 MILE WEST OF LIVE OAK CANYON ROAD TO COUNTY LINE ROAD UNDERCROSSING
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date8/2/2019 Sample Unique Key21
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing8/2/2019
Sample typePer Request A brief description of the sampleClass 2 Agg Base
The quantity of what the sample constitutes1 bag From where was the sample collectedJob Site
First name of sampler or witnessed byJuan Last name of sampler or witnessed byLeRoy
Title of samplerField Technician Laboratory sample identification8662
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameCaltrans Transportation Laboratory (TL) NumberC 003101-4
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifier
Structure name
Material Information
Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)Unknown
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sampleUnknown The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sampleUnknown
The plant numberUnknown A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedI-10 Lanes number 1 and 2
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledUnknown Primary Aggregate Nominal Size1-1/2 inch
The concrete mix design numberUnknown Lot numberUnknown
Sublot numberUnknown HMA Design ID
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2019-08-02-21
DIME Test ID: 2019-08-02-21-6
Testing Lab: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method of Test for Determining the Resistance "R"; Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2019-09-16
Test Results

How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Tess Perez / Kiet Phan
Date of test: 08/14/2019
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 98 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 95 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 91 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 89 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 86 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 83 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 76 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 68 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 60 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 51 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 41 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 29 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 20 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 98 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 95 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 91 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 89 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 86 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 83 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 76 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 68 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 60 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 51 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 41 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 29 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 20 %
R value:43
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 09/16/2019