Test 2019-03-29-16-7 (CTM 301-March 2000) Summary

Project Information
Project IdentifiersProject ID: 209695
DEA: 08347704
EFIS: 0800000616
DIST-CO-RTE-PM08-SBD-SR-58-0/12.9
Work Description(Alternative Delivery) The CMGC project will upgrade SR 58 from 2- to 4-lanes in San Bernardino County from the Kern County line to 7.5 miles east of US-395.
Location DescriptionSR-58 / 395 Kramer Junction project. In San Bernardino County from the Kern County line to 7.5 miles east of US-395.
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date3/29/2019 Sample Unique Key16
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing3/29/2019
Sample typePer Request A brief description of the sampleSggregate Subbase (LCB)
The quantity of what the sample constitutes2 bags From where was the sample collectedJob Site
First name of sampler or witnessed byShahidi Last name of sampler or witnessed byShaine
Title of samplerRE Laboratory sample identification
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameContractor Kiewit Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifierNot set
Structure nameNot set
Material Information
Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)Unknown
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sampleUnknown The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sampleUnknown
The plant numberUnknown A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedJobsite
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledUnknown Primary Aggregate Nominal Size3/4 inch
The concrete mix design numberUnknown Lot numberUnknown
Sublot numberUnknown HMA Design ID
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2019-03-29-16
DIME Test ID: 2019-03-29-16-7
Testing Lab: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method of Test for Determining the Resistance "R"; Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2019-05-04
Test Results

How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Tess Perez
Date of test: 04/04/2019
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 97 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 91 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 85 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 68 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 54 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 42 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 31 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 21 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 12 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 6.8 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 97 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 91 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 85 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 68 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 54 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 42 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 31 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 21 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 12 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 6.8 %
R value:78
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 04/27/2019