Test 2013-12-06-7000585-3 (CTM 301-March 2000) Summary

Project Information
Project IdentifiersProject ID: 5266
DEA: 08448404
EFIS: 0800000712
COOP: 081488A1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM08-RIV-91-15.6/21.6
Work DescriptionCONSTRUCT HOV LANES AND WIDEN BRIDGES.
Location DescriptionRIVERSIDE COUNTY IN RIVERSIDE FROM ADAMS STREET TO THE ROUTE 60/215 SEPARATION
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date12/6/2013 Sample Unique Key7000585
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing1/15/2014
Sample typeAcceptance A brief description of the sampleClass 2 Aggregate Base
The quantity of what the sample constitutes1 Bag From where was the sample collectedOther
First name of sampler or witnessed byKohnson Last name of sampler or witnessed byChan
Title of samplerNot set Laboratory sample identification4011B
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameE/B 91 Sta. 324 50 Shoulder Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifierNot set
Structure nameNot set
Material Information
Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)Unknown
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sampleNot set The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sampleNot set
The plant numberNot set A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedE/B 91 Sta. 324 50
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledNot set Primary Aggregate Nominal Size
The concrete mix design number Lot numberNot set
Sublot numberNot set HMA Design ID
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2013-12-06-7000585
DIME Test ID: 2013-12-06-7000585-3
Testing Lab: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method of Test for Determining the Resistance "R"; Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2015-02-20
Test Results

How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Vincent Onoh
Date of test: 02/03/2014
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 98 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 85 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 64 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 28 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 17 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 12 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 9 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 7 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 6 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 5 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 87 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 65 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 29 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 18 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 12 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 9 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 7 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 6 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 5.2 %
R value:77
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 02/20/2015