Print Report | Back to Test Summary

Testing Report for 2016-08-01-7-3

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 210696 DEA: 080M2804 EFIS: 0800000472 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 08-SBD-15-171.8/173.8
Work Description: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND WIDEN, CONC AND HMA PVMT, COLD PLANE AC PVMT.
Location Description: In SBD County
Contractor Name: Unknown
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: John Santos Structure Rep.: Zahlout, Faisal

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2016-08-01-7
TL Number from the TL Form: C 974880
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: 213-792-4794
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Soil
Sample Taken Date: 08/01/2016
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 08/02/2016
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 2 Bags
A brief description of the sample: Structure Backfill
From where was the sample collected: Job Site
Laboratory sample identification: 6302B
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Native Material

Material Information

The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample: Unknown
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample: Unknown
A detailed description of where the material sample was collected: Sta 85 50 to 86 25 Stockpile
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled: Unknown

Test Information

DIME Test ID: 2016-08-01-7-1
Test Method: CTM 202-November 2011: Method of Test for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates
Verified Date: 05/30/2019
Date Tested: 08/08/2016
Submitted By Organization: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 13970 Victoria St,
Organization City: Fontana
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92336
Organization Email: jose.guzman@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 213-792-4794
General Comments for this Test:
Additional Comments When Verified:

Submitted Test Results

How will the R value be determined? By stabilometer
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve 98 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve 96 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve 92 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve 86 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve 82 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve 70 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve 58 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve 46 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve 36 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve 27 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve 20 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve 15 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve 93 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve 89 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve 76 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve 63 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve 50 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve 39 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve 29 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve 22 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve 17 %
R value 63