Print Report | Back to Test Summary

Testing Report for 2015-10-31-2-3

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 208714 DEA: 08043514 EFIS: 0800000010 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 08-SBD-58-R22.2/R31.1
Work Description: REALIGN AND WIDEN 2 TO 4 LANES EXPRESSWAY
Location Description: HINKLEY ROAD FROM 2.4 MILES WEST OF HIDDEN RIVER ROAD TO? 0.7 MILE EAST OF LENWOOD ROAD.
Contractor Name: Unknown
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Shaine Shahidi Structure Rep.: Ankir, Ahmad

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2015-10-31-2
TL Number from the TL Form: C937013
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: 213-792-4794
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Soil
Sample Taken Date: 10/31/2015
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 11/04/2015
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 2 Bags
A brief description of the sample: Soil
From where was the sample collected: Source
Laboratory sample identification: 5272B
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: NA

Material Information

The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample: Unknown
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample: Unknown
A detailed description of where the material sample was collected: A 1 Mainline EB east of Lenwood Rd Sta 1638 00
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled: Unknown

Test Information

DIME Test ID: 2015-10-31-2-1
Test Method: CTM 202-November 2011: Method of Test for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates
Verified Date: 11/16/2015
Date Tested: 11/06/2015
Submitted By Organization: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 13970 Victoria St,
Organization City: Fontana
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92336
Organization Email: jose.guzman@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 213-792-4794
General Comments for this Test:
Additional Comments When Verified:

Submitted Test Results

How will the R value be determined? By stabilometer
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve 96 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve 81 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve 60 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve 39 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve 24 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve 15 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve 12 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve 96 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve 81 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve 60 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve 39 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve 24 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve 15 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve 12 %
R value 60