Summary for Test 2020-08-06-33-2
Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000Project Information
| Project Identifiers | Project ID: 215038 DEA: 051J7804 EFIS: 0518000052 |
|---|---|
| DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 05-SLO-101-61.88/61.88 |
| Award Date | 10/22/2024 |
| Closeout Date | 07/02/2026 |
| Work Description | SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS |
| Location Description | WELLSONA SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, SLO 101 |
| QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 09/03/2020) |
Sample Information
| Sample Taken Date | 08/06/2020 | Sample Unique Key | 33 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 08/06/2020 | Sample type | Preliminary |
| A brief description of the sample | Bags of Soil | The quantity of what the sample constitutes | Site Conditions |
| From where was the sample collected | Job Site | First name of sampler or witnessed by | Jacob |
| Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Berven | Title of sampler | |
| Telephone number of sampler | Laboratory sample identification | D5 20-D-032 | |
| Linked DIME Sample ID | The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Nature | |
| Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | ||
| Structure unique identifier | Structure name | ||
| Bid Item | Not set |
Material Information
| Material Type | Soil | The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | 20 to 25 foot deep | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | PM 61.7 15 ft SB EP |
| Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2020-08-06-33
DIME Test ID: 2020-08-06-33-2
Testing Lab: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2020-08-12
Test Results
How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Daniel Gingras
Date of test: 08/12/2020
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 99 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 98 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 96 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 94 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 91 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 81 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 69 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 56 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 46 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 35 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 23 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 14.7 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 98 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 95 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 84 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 72 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 58 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 48 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 36 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 24 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 15.2 %
R value: 52
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 8/12/2020 ✔
