Summary for Test 2020-05-22-22-11
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 212866 DEA: 021H9704 EFIS: 0216000051 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 02-TEH-36-12.6/13.1 |
Award Date | 11/25/2019 |
Closeout Date | 10/06/2020 |
Work Description | CURVE REALIGNMENT AND HMA PAVING. |
Location Description | TEHAMA COUNTY ABOUT 16 MILES EAST OF PLATINA FROM 2.3 MILES EAST TO 2.8 MILES EAST OF DRY CREEK BRIDGE |
QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 01/08/2019) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 05/22/2020 | Sample Unique Key | 22 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 05/22/2020 |
Sample type | Verification | A brief description of the sample | Combined Untreated 3/4-inch Type G Aggregate |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | JMF Verification | From where was the sample collected | Source |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | Karen | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Spliethof |
Title of sampler | Telephone number of sampler | ||
Laboratory sample identification | D78443F | Linked DIME Sample ID | |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Shasta Ranch Aggregates - Anderson, CA | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 897705 |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
Structure name |
Material Information
Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | 91-45-0057 |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||
The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Lab-Batched from Sized Untreated Aggregate Stockpiles | |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 3/4 inch | |
The concrete mix design number | JMF 20-09-S1 | Lot number | |
Sublot number | Aggregate Mix Number | Not set |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2020-05-22-22
DIME Test ID: 2020-05-22-22-11
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2020-07-21
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Dennis Hickey
Date of test: 07/21/2020
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 15.4 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 16.8 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 22.2 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 10.6 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 518 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 7.2 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 198 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 10.8 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 126.9 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 2.1 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 26.9 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 4 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 96 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 8 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 92 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 7 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 93 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 5 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 95 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 7/21/2020 ✔