Summary for Test 2019-10-18-10-4
Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 214705 DEA: 120P6904 EFIS: 1216000003 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 12-ORA-1-5.5/7.9 |
Award Date | Not set |
Closeout Date | Not set |
Work Description | Not set |
Location Description | Not set |
QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 02/22/2021) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 10/18/2019 | Sample Unique Key | 10 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 10/29/2019 |
Sample type | Preliminary | A brief description of the sample | Native Soil for Subgrade |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | 1 BAG | From where was the sample collected | Job Site |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | FARHAD | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | HADJIBABALE |
Title of sampler | TE Civil | Telephone number of sampler | |
Laboratory sample identification | 8777 | Linked DIME Sample ID | 2019-10-18-10 |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Native Material | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | MB-17 | Structure unique identifier | |
Structure name |
Material Information
Material Type | Soil | The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | Unknown |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | Unknown | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | SR 01 PCH |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Unknown |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2019-10-18-10
DIME Test ID: 2019-10-18-10-4
Testing Lab: CT D08 - Fontana Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2020-03-15
Test Results
How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: KIET PHAN
Date of test: 11/12/2019
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 99 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 98 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 95 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 92 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 84 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 76 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 67 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 56 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 45 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 35 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 29 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 97 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 94 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 86 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 0 %
R value: 19
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 3/15/2020 ✔