Summary for Test 2020-02-03-10-3

Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 214681
DEA: 021H5104
EFIS: 0216000148
DIST-CO-RTE-PM02-TEH-99-9.0/9.3
Award Date11/04/2021
Closeout Date08/14/2023
Work DescriptionCHAMPLIN SLOUGH
Location DescriptionREPLACE BRIDGE IN TEHAMA COUNTY NEAR LOS MOLINOS FROM 0.2 MILE SOUTH TO 0.2 MILE NORTH OF CHAMPLIN SLOUGH
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 03/02/2020)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date02/03/2020 Sample Unique Key10
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing02/04/2020 Sample typePreliminary
A brief description of the sampleSoil The quantity of what the sample constitutesStructural Section Recomendation
From where was the sample collectedJob Site First name of sampler or witnessed byBrian
Last name of sampler or witnessed bySteiner Title of samplerAAME
Telephone number of sampler Laboratory sample identificationD78326
Linked DIME Sample ID The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameIn Situ
Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number824578 Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form
Structure unique identifier Structure name
Bid ItemNot set

Material Information

Material TypeSoil The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sampleUnknown
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sampleUnknown A detailed description of where the material sample was collected02-TEH-99-9.25, Embankment, 0.5 - 1.0 foot Depth
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledUnknown

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2020-02-03-10
DIME Test ID: 2020-02-03-10-3
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2020-02-19

Test Results


How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Ward Jenkins
Date of test: 02/07/2020
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 95 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 90 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 81 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 76 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 64 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 55 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 49 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 44 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 40 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 37 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 34 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 88 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 81 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 76 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 65 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 58 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 52 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 47 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 43 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 40 %
R value: 8
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters): Raw data input requires horizontal pressure and displacement at exactly 300 psi exhudation pressure. Does not interpolate data for the result.

Test was verified on 2/19/2020 ✔