Summary for Test 2020-02-07-14-5
Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000Project Information
| Project Identifiers | Project ID: 214710 DEA: 051J4704 EFIS: 0517000184 |
|---|---|
| DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 05-SB-135-17.3/17.6 |
| Award Date | 05/27/2021 |
| Closeout Date | 08/17/2022 |
| Work Description | BUNNY AVENUE AND NORTH BROADWAY PED IMPROVEMENTS |
| Location Description | SANTA BARBARA COUNTY IN SANTA MARIA AT BUNNY AVENUE AND FROM ROEMER WAY TO PREISKER LANE |
| QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 02/20/2020) |
Sample Information
| Sample Taken Date | 02/07/2020 | Sample Unique Key | 14 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 02/07/2020 | Sample type | Preliminary |
| A brief description of the sample | Native Basement Soil | The quantity of what the sample constitutes | Unknown |
| From where was the sample collected | Job Site | First name of sampler or witnessed by | Jacob |
| Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Berven | Title of sampler | |
| Telephone number of sampler | Laboratory sample identification | D5 20-D-009 | |
| Linked DIME Sample ID | The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Existing | |
| Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | ||
| Structure unique identifier | Structure name | ||
| Bid Item | Not set |
Material Information
| Material Type | Soil | The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | Unknown |
|---|---|---|---|
| The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | Unknown | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | 3 to 5 feet depth |
| Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Unknown |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2020-02-07-14
DIME Test ID: 2020-02-07-14-5
Testing Lab: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2020-02-18
Test Results
How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Daniel Gingras
Date of test: 02/12/2020
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 95 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 93 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 88 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 85 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 79 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 73 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 66 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 55 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 36 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 14 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 9.2 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 95 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 91 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 85 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 79 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 71 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 59 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 39 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 15 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 9.9 %
R value: 76
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 2/18/2020 ✔
