Summary for Test 2019-06-19-20-6
Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000Project Information
| Project Identifiers | Project ID: 213746 DEA: 080Q75U4 EFIS: 0817000114 |
|---|---|
| DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 08-SBD,RIV-60-R4.6/R9.9, R0.0/12.2 |
| Award Date | 04/18/2019 |
| Closeout Date | 06/28/2022 |
| Work Description | REPLACEMENT OF TWO OUTSIDE LANES AND CONCRETE SLABS |
| Location Description | Not set |
| QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 06/17/2019) |
Sample Information
| Sample Taken Date | 06/19/2019 | Sample Unique Key | 20 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 06/20/2019 | Sample type | Per Request |
| A brief description of the sample | Soil Sample Native Selected | The quantity of what the sample constitutes | 1 bag |
| From where was the sample collected | Source | First name of sampler or witnessed by | Jose |
| Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Guzman | Title of sampler | MREA |
| Telephone number of sampler | (909) 829-6292 | Laboratory sample identification | 8619 |
| Linked DIME Sample ID | The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Caltrans | |
| Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 8619 | Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | |
| Structure unique identifier | Structure name | ||
| Bid Item | Not set |
Material Information
| Material Type | Soil | The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | Unknown |
|---|---|---|---|
| The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | Unknown | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | A-19-005 |
| Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Unknown |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2019-06-19-20
DIME Test ID: 2019-06-19-20-6
Testing Lab: CT D08 - Fontana Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2019-07-03
Test Results
How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Tess Perez/Mike Magana
Date of test: 06/27/2019
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 98 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 97 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 93 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 81 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 66 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 47 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 28 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 16 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 10 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 98 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 97 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 93 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 81 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 66 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 47 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 28 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 16 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 10 %
R value: 62
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 7/3/2019 ✔
