Summary for Test 2019-04-25-14-10

Test performed: ASTM D4791-10

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 210808
DEA: 020E0904
EFIS: 0200000016
DIST-CO-RTE-PM02-SHA-5-R29.3/R31.1,R45.0/R45.8
Award Date02/03/2016
Closeout Date10/21/2020
Work DescriptionREPLACE BRIDGE, REALIGN ROADWAY AND SEISMIC RETROFIT
Location DescriptionIN SHASTA COUNTY ABT 8 MI N OF SHASTA LAKE CTY AND NEAR LAKEHEAD FRM TURNTABLE BAY O/C TO 0.1 MI N OF O'BRIEN SRRA & FRM 0.4 MI S TO 0.3 MI N OF DOG CREEK BRIDGE.
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 09/23/2015)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date04/25/2019 Sample Unique Key14
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing04/25/2019 Sample typeVerification
A brief description of the sample3/4-inch Type A Untreated Virgin Aggregate The quantity of what the sample constitutesJMF Verification
From where was the sample collectedSource First name of sampler or witnessed byJosh
Last name of sampler or witnessed byWilliams Title of samplerConsultant
Telephone number of sampler Laboratory sample identificationD77853F
Linked DIME Sample ID The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameShasta Ranch Aggregates
Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number001903 Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form
Structure unique identifier Structure name
Bid ItemNot set

Material Information

Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site)91-45-0057::SHASTA RANCH AGGREGATES
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sampleUnknown The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sampleL190276
The plant numberUnknown A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedLab-Batched from Sized Untreated Aggregate Stockpiles
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledUnknown Primary Aggregate Nominal Size3/4 inch
The concrete mix design numberJMF 19-09-S1 Lot number0
Sublot number0 Aggregate Mix NumberNot set

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2019-04-25-14
DIME Test ID: 2019-04-25-14-10
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2019-05-29

Test Results


Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles

Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 1:5
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Dennis Hickey
Date of test: 05/28/2019
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 10.1 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 24 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 20.5 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 0 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 356.3 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 201.2 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 63.8 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 0.00 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 100.00 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 5/29/2019 ✔