Summary for Test 2026-08-19-4-9

Test performed: ASTM D4791-10

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 1001686
DEA: 11430264
EFIS: 1118000083
DIST-CO-RTE-PM11-SD-94,188-15.2/65.3,0.0/1.9
Award DateNot set
Closeout DateNot set
Work DescriptionDRAINAGE RESTORATION, ADA CURB RAMPS & COMPLETE STREET.
Location DescriptionSAN DIEGO COUNTY ABOUT 6 MILES EAST OF LEMON GROVE ON ROUTE 94 FROM SWEETWATER RIVER BRIDGE TO AVENUE DE ROBLES VERDES NEAR MANZANITA AND ON ROUTE 188 FROM MEXICO BORDER NEAR TECATE TO ROUTE 94.
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 02/05/2026)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date08/19/2026 Sample Unique Key4
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing08/19/2026 Sample typeJMF Verification
A brief description of the sampleJMFV The quantity of what the sample constitutes5 bags
From where was the sample collectedSupplier First name of sampler or witnessed byMohammed
Last name of sampler or witnessed byMasud Title of sampler
Telephone number of sampler Laboratory sample identification
Linked DIME Sample ID The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameMartin Marietta Lakeside
Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form
Structure unique identifier Structure name
Bid ItemNot set

Material Information

Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site)See Mix
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample
The plant number A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedPlant
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled Primary Aggregate Nominal Size1/2 inch
The concrete mix design number Lot number
Sublot number Aggregate Mix Number21218180T3

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2026-08-19-4
DIME Test ID: 2026-08-19-4-9
Testing Lab: CT D11 - District 11 Materials Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2026-08-28

Test Results


Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles

Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Melchor Oronoz
Date of test: 08/27/2026
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 4 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 27 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 100 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 198.7 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 2.2 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 658.2 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 5.5 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 250.1 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 2 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 98 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 2 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 98 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters): Complies

Test was verified on 8/28/2026 ✔