Summary for Test 2026-04-29-18-13

Test performed: ASTM D4791-10

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 1001686
DEA: 11430264
EFIS: 1118000083
COOP: NONE
DIST-CO-RTE-PM11-SD-94,188-15.2/65.3,0.0/1.9
Award DateNot set
Closeout DateNot set
Work DescriptionDRAINAGE RESTORATION, ADA CURB RAMPS & COMPLETE STREET.
Location DescriptionSAN DIEGO COUNTY ABOUT 6 MILES EAST OF LEMON GROVE ON ROUTE 94 FROM SWEETWATER RIVER BRIDGE TO AVENUE DE ROBLES VERDES NEAR MANZANITA AND ON ROUTE 188 FROM MEXICO BORDER NEAR TECATE TO ROUTE 94.
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 02/05/2026)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date04/29/2026 Sample Unique Key18
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing04/29/2026
Sample typeVerification A brief description of the sampleJMFR
The quantity of what the sample constitutes5 bags From where was the sample collectedSupplier
First name of sampler or witnessed byGerardo Last name of sampler or witnessed byCordero
Title of sampler Telephone number of sampler
Laboratory sample identification Linked DIME Sample ID
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameMartin Marrietta Lakesides Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifier
Structure name Bid ItemNot set

Material Information

Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site)See Mix
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample
The plant number A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedPlant
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled Primary Aggregate Nominal Size1-1/2 inch
The concrete mix design number Lot number
Sublot number Aggregate Mix Number21517070

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2026-04-29-18
DIME Test ID: 2026-04-29-18-13
Testing Lab: CT D11 - District 11 Materials Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2026-05-15

Test Results


Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles

Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 3:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Melchor Oronoz
Date of test: 05/12/2026
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 82 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 74 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 58 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 47 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 35 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 83.4 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 1406.2 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 1 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 137.9 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 1210.4 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 111.4 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 778.7 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 89.2 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 928.1 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 6 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 94 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 10 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 90 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 13 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 87 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 9 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 91 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 7 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 93 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters): Retest - 3:1 Ratio

Test was verified on 5/15/2026