Summary for Test 2025-04-15-51-1
Test performed: AASHTO T104-99r16Project Information
| Project Identifiers | Project ID: 995524 DEA: 021H3604 EFIS: 0216000040 |
|---|---|
| DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 02-SIS-96-76.8/78.0 |
| Award Date | 03/22/2024 |
| Closeout Date | Not set |
| Work Description | REPLACE BRIDGE. |
| Location Description | SISKIYOU COUNTY NEAR HORSE CREEK FROM 0.4 MILE WEST OF KLAMATH RIVER BRIDGE TO 2.0 MILES WEST OF KOHL CREEK |
| QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 12/27/2023) |
Sample Information
| Sample Taken Date | 04/15/2025 | Sample Unique Key | 51 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 04/15/2025 |
| Sample type | Verification | A brief description of the sample | 2 bags of Dust Untreated Sized Virgin Aggregate |
| The quantity of what the sample constitutes | JMF Verification and Annual Soundness Testing | From where was the sample collected | Manufacturer |
| First name of sampler or witnessed by | Giuliano | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Giuntoli |
| Title of sampler | JET | Telephone number of sampler | |
| Laboratory sample identification | D79842C | Linked DIME Sample ID | |
| The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Tullis — Northstate Asphalt (Redding, CA) | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 823562C |
| Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
| Structure name | Bid Item | Not set |
Material Information
| Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | 91-45-0057::Shasta Ranch Aggregates (Anderson, CA) |
|---|---|---|---|
| The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | Dust | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | |
| The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Stockpile | |
| Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | fine | |
| The concrete mix design number | Lot number | ||
| Sublot number | Aggregate Mix Number |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2025-04-15-51
DIME Test ID: 2025-04-15-51-1
Testing Lab: CT HQ - Sacramento Aggregate Testing Laboratory
Test Method: AASHTO T104-99r16: Standard Method of Test for Soundness of Aggregate by Use of Sodium Sulfate or Magnesium Sulfate (Soundness)
Test Release Date: 2025-07-16
Test Results
Percentage of the total sample represented by each size
Size of aggregate being tested: Fine Aggregate
What type of solution was used?: Sodium sulfate
What was the condition of the solution?: Freshly prepared
Number of immersion cycles performed: 5
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: David Padilla
Date of test: 07/14/2025
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the No. 8 sieve: 28 %
Percentage on the No. 16 sieve: 26 %
Percentage on the No. 30 sieve: 15 %
Percentage on the No. 50 sieve: 9 %
Percentage passing the No. 50 sieve: 22 %
Mass grams of ⅜ inch x No. 4 material tested: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch x No. 4 material retained on the No. 4 sieve after testing: 0 g
Mass grams of No. 4 x 8 material tested: 100 g
Mass grams of No. 4 x 8 material retained on the No. 8 sieve after testing: 98.5 g
Mass grams of No. 8 x 16 material tested: 100 g
Mass grams of No. 8 x 16 material retained on the No. 16 sieve after testing: 98 g
Mass grams of No. 16 x 30 material tested: 100 g
Mass grams of No. 16 x 30 material retained on the No. 30 sieve after testing: 99.5 g
Mass grams of No. 30 x 50 material tested: 100 g
Mass grams of No. 30 x 50 material retained on the No. 50 sieve after testing: 98.9 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch x No. 4 material tested: 0 g
Percentage of ⅜ inch x No. 4 material loss: 0 %
Percentage of No. 4 x 8 material loss: 2 %
Percentage of No. 8 x 16 material loss: 2 %
Percentage of No. 16 x 30 material loss: 1 %
Percentage of No. 30 x 50 material loss: 1 %
Fine weighted average loss: 1 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters): Due to Translab closure, sample tested at SRL
Test was verified on 7/16/2025 ✔
