Summary for Test 2024-08-12-95-5

Test performed: ASTM D4791-10

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 995514
DEA: 024J8204
EFIS: 0223000077
DIST-CO-RTE-PM02-MOD-299-14.7/20.0
Award Date06/20/2024
Closeout Date11/27/2024
Work DescriptionSCHAFFER MT CHIP - PLACE ASPHALT RUBBER CHIP SEAL WITH REPLACE AC SURFACING.
Location DescriptionMODOC COUNTY NEAR CANBY FROM 0.1 MILE EAST OF COUNTY ROAD 85 TO 1.7 MILES WEST OF ROUTE 139
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 12/29/2023)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date08/12/2024 Sample Unique Key95
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing08/12/2024
Sample typeAcceptance A brief description of the sample3/8" Chips
The quantity of what the sample constitutes3 Bags From where was the sample collectedManufacturer
First name of sampler or witnessed byTerry Last name of sampler or witnessed byMcCormick
Title of samplerConsultant Telephone number of sampler
Laboratory sample identificationD79684 Linked DIME Sample ID
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameHat Creek - Shaw Pit Facility Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number854555
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifier
Structure name Bid ItemNot set

Material Information

Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site)91-21-0008::Shaw Pit – Lookout, CA
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample
The plant number A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedStockpile
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled Primary Aggregate Nominal Size3/8 inch
The concrete mix design number Lot number
Sublot number Aggregate Mix Number

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2024-08-12-95
DIME Test ID: 2024-08-12-95-5
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2024-09-18

Test Results


Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles

Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 3:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Josh Ferency
Date of test: 09/18/2024
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 2 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 21 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 52 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 20 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 11.1 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 165.1 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 7.5 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 69.7 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 6.6 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 22.2 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 6 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 94 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 10 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 90 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 23 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 77 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 12 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 88 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters): F&E(3:1)=12

Test was verified on 9/18/2024