Summary for Test 2024-08-19-74-8
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
| Project Identifiers | Project ID: 1000061 DEA: 051Q4804 EFIS: 0523000036 |
|---|---|
| DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 05-SCR-1-R5.0/8.9 |
| Award Date | 04/10/2024 |
| Closeout Date | 04/02/2025 |
| Work Description | RHMA OVERLAY, STRIPING AND MODIFY TRAFFIC STATIONS. |
| Location Description | SANTA CRUZ COUNTY FROM 0.9 MILE NORTH OF BUENA VISTA DRIVE UNDERCROSSING TO 0.2 MILE SOUTH OF RIO DEL MAR OVERCROSSING |
| QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 02/05/2024) |
Sample Information
| Sample Taken Date | 08/19/2024 | Sample Unique Key | 74 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 09/05/2024 | Sample type | Dispute Resolution |
| A brief description of the sample | 1/2" RHMA-G | The quantity of what the sample constitutes | 8 boxes, four bags, four quart cans |
| From where was the sample collected | Job Site | First name of sampler or witnessed by | Wesley |
| Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Rider | Title of sampler | TET |
| Telephone number of sampler | 813-818-0254 | Laboratory sample identification | |
| Linked DIME Sample ID | The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Graniterock Aromas Batch plant | |
| Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | ||
| Structure unique identifier | Structure name | ||
| Bid Item | Not set |
Material Information
| Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | 91-35-0012 |
|---|---|---|---|
| The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||
| The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Jobsite | |
| Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 1/2 inch | |
| The concrete mix design number | Lot number | ||
| Sublot number | Aggregate Mix Number |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2024-08-19-74
DIME Test ID: 2024-08-19-74-8
Testing Lab: CT HQ - Sacramento Aggregate Testing Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2024-09-11
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Aristeo Flores
Date of test: 09/11/2024
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0.7 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 13.7 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 43.6 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 232.6 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 86.6 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 9/11/2024 ✔
