Summary for Test 2024-08-06-116-4
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
| Project Identifiers | Project ID: 1000090 DEA: 024J9204 EFIS: 0223000087 |
|---|---|
| DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 02-TRI-299-61.0/64.0,70.0/72.2 |
| Award Date | 04/16/2024 |
| Closeout Date | 11/27/2024 |
| Work Description | ASPHALT RUBBER CHIP SEAL WITH REPLACE ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACING. |
| Location Description | TRINITY COUNTY NEAR DOUGLAS CITY FROM STEEL BRIDGE ROAD TO 1.5 MILES WEST OF GRASS VALLEY CREEK BRIDGE NO 05-0013 AND FROM 2.6 MILES EAST OF TRINITY DAM BOULEVARD TO THE SHASTA COUNTY LINE |
| QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 03/18/2024) |
Sample Information
| Sample Taken Date | 08/06/2024 | Sample Unique Key | 116 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 08/06/2024 | Sample type | Acceptance |
| A brief description of the sample | 2 bags of Uncoated 3/8″ Aggregate for Use in ARB Chip Seal | The quantity of what the sample constitutes | 2 Bags |
| From where was the sample collected | Manufacturer | First name of sampler or witnessed by | Cindy |
| Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Bryant | Title of sampler | TET |
| Telephone number of sampler | Laboratory sample identification | D79479 | |
| Linked DIME Sample ID | The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Tullis Inc. - Northstate Asphalt (Redding CA) | |
| Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 853423 | Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | |
| Structure unique identifier | Structure name | ||
| Bid Item | Not set |
Material Information
| Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | 91-45-0061 |
|---|---|---|---|
| The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||
| The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Stockpile | |
| Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 3/8 inch | |
| The concrete mix design number | Lot number | ||
| Sublot number | Aggregate Mix Number |
Test Details
Test Details QR Code
Scan this code to open this Test Details view on another device.
Sample Details QR Code
Scan this code to open this Sample Details view on another device.
DIME Sample ID: 2024-08-06-116
DIME Test ID: 2024-08-06-116-4
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2024-09-05
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 3:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Colt Sweeny
Date of test: 09/05/2024
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 30 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 53 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 0 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 222 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 109.4 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters): F&E(3:1)=0%
Test was verified on 9/5/2024 ✔