Summary for Test 2023-10-10-84-3
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
| Project Identifiers | Project ID: 994615 DEA: 112N1644 EFIS: 1122000151 |
|---|---|
| DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 11-IMP-8-R3.7/R48.0 |
| Award Date | 05/19/2023 |
| Closeout Date | 06/11/2024 |
| Work Description | MICROSURFACING, COLD PLANE, RHMA, PAVEMENT MARKING, & CENSUS SYSTEMS. |
| Location Description | IMPERIAL COUNTY AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS FROM 0.7 MILE EAST OF MOUNTAIN SPRINGS ROAD UNDERCROSSING TO 0.2 MILE EAST OF ROUTE 7/8 SEPARATION |
| QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 06/04/2024) |
Sample Information
| Sample Taken Date | 10/10/2023 | Sample Unique Key | 84 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 11/13/2023 |
| Sample type | Quality Assurance | A brief description of the sample | 1/2" RHMA-G |
| The quantity of what the sample constitutes | 12 boxes 4 bags | From where was the sample collected | Source |
| First name of sampler or witnessed by | Joe | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Loper |
| Title of sampler | Telephone number of sampler | ||
| Laboratory sample identification | 9814-PSU | Linked DIME Sample ID | 2023-10-10-83 |
| The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | API Gateway | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | |
| Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
| Structure name | Bid Item | Not set |
Material Information
| Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | 91-00-0000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||
| The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Plant | |
| Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 1/2 inch | |
| The concrete mix design number | Lot number | 1 | |
| Sublot number | 1 | Aggregate Mix Number |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2023-10-10-84
DIME Test ID: 2023-10-10-84-3
Testing Lab: CT D11 - District 11 Materials Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2023-11-22
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Number
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Shawn Rivers
Date of test: 11/17/2023
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 0 %
Number of 6 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 6 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 5 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 5 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ¾ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ¾ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 100 particles
Number of ⅜ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ⅜ inch that were not flat and elongated: 100 particles
Number of ¼ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ¼ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of No. 4 that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of No. 4 that were not flat and elongated: 100 particles
Percentage (by number) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by number) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by number) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by number) that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by number) that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 11/22/2023 ✔
