Summary for Test 2023-09-18-62-3
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
| Project Identifiers | Project ID: 994617 DEA: 112N1664 EFIS: 1122000153 |
|---|---|
| DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 11-SD-79-44.7/53.0 |
| Award Date | 05/18/2023 |
| Closeout Date | 06/11/2024 |
| Work Description | COLD PLANE, RHMA OVERLAY, PAVEMENT MARKING, & RUMBLE STRIP. |
| Location Description | SAN DIEGO COUNTY NEAR SUNSHINE SUMMIT FROM 1.2 MILES NORTH OF ACORN CREEK BRIDGE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY LINE |
| QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 11/30/2023) |
Sample Information
| Sample Taken Date | 09/18/2023 | Sample Unique Key | 62 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 09/19/2023 | Sample type | Quality Assurance |
| A brief description of the sample | 3/4" HMA PSU | The quantity of what the sample constitutes | 12 boxes 3 bags |
| From where was the sample collected | Source | First name of sampler or witnessed by | N/A |
| Last name of sampler or witnessed by | N/A | Title of sampler | |
| Telephone number of sampler | Laboratory sample identification | 9601-PSU | |
| Linked DIME Sample ID | The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Martin Marietta | |
| Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | ||
| Structure unique identifier | Structure name | ||
| Bid Item | Not set |
Material Information
| Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|
| The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||
| The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Plant | |
| Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 3/4 inch | |
| The concrete mix design number | Lot number | ||
| Sublot number | Aggregate Mix Number |
Test Details
Test Details QR Code
Scan this code to open this Test Details view on another device.
Sample Details QR Code
Scan this code to open this Sample Details view on another device.
DIME Sample ID: 2023-09-18-62
DIME Test ID: 2023-09-18-62-3
Testing Lab: CT D11 - District 11 Materials Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2023-10-03
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Number
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Daniel Smith
Date of test: 09/29/2023
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 0 %
Number of 6 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 6 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 5 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 5 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ¾ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ¾ inch that were not flat and elongated: 100 particles
Number of ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 1 particles
Number of ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 99 particles
Number of ⅜ inch that were flat and elongated: 9 particles
Number of ⅜ inch that were not flat and elongated: 92 particles
Number of ¼ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ¼ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of No. 4 that were flat and elongated: 2 particles
Number of No. 4 that were not flat and elongated: 98 particles
Percentage (by number) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by number) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1 %
Percentage (by number) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 99 %
Percentage (by number) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 9 %
Percentage (by number) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 91 %
Percentage (by number) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 2 %
Percentage (by number) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 98 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by number) that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by number) that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 10/3/2023 ✔