Summary for Test 2022-03-17-25-10
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
| Project Identifiers | Project ID: 66667 DEA: JMFPP EFIS: 0019000043 |
|---|---|
| DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 59--- |
| Award Date | Not set |
| Closeout Date | Not set |
| Work Description | Special project for submitting Sample information for JMF Prequalification Program. |
| Location Description | Not set |
| QA Service Level | NOT VERIFIED |
Sample Information
| Sample Taken Date | 03/17/2022 | Sample Unique Key | 25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 03/21/2022 | Sample type | Verification |
| A brief description of the sample | Combined Untreated Virgin Aggregate for use in 3/4-inch Type A HMA | The quantity of what the sample constitutes | JMF Verification |
| From where was the sample collected | Manufacturer | First name of sampler or witnessed by | Cindy |
| Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Bryant | Title of sampler | TET |
| Telephone number of sampler | Laboratory sample identification | D79009F | |
| Linked DIME Sample ID | 2022-03-17-22, 2022-03-17-23, 2022-03-17-24 | The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Tullis – Northstate Asphalt (Redding, CA) |
| Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 708110 | Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | |
| Structure unique identifier | Structure name | ||
| Bid Item | Not set |
Material Information
| Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | 91-45-0057::Shasta Ranch Aggregates |
|---|---|---|---|
| The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||
| The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Lab-Batched from Sized Untreated Aggregate Stockpiles | |
| Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 3/4 inch | |
| The concrete mix design number | JMF 22-01-S01 | Lot number | |
| Sublot number | Aggregate Mix Number | Not set |
Test Details
Test Details QR Code
Scan this code to open this Test Details view on another device.
Sample Details QR Code
Scan this code to open this Sample Details view on another device.
DIME Sample ID: 2022-03-17-25
DIME Test ID: 2022-03-17-25-10
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2022-05-12
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Karen Dorado
Date of test: 03/30/2022
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 11 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 25.3 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 21 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 0 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 418.9 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 8.4 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 241.5 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 9.7 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 119.1 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 3 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 97 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 8 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 92 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 4 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 96 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 5/12/2022 ✔