Summary for Test 2022-03-17-25-10
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
| Project Identifiers | Project ID: 66667 DEA: JMFPP EFIS: 0019000043 |
|---|---|
| DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 59--- |
| Award Date | Not set |
| Closeout Date | Not set |
| Work Description | Special project for submitting Sample information for JMF Prequalification Program. |
| Location Description | Not set |
| QA Service Level | NOT VERIFIED |
Sample Information
| Sample Taken Date | 03/17/2022 | Sample Unique Key | 25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 03/21/2022 |
| Sample type | Verification | A brief description of the sample | Combined Untreated Virgin Aggregate for use in 3/4-inch Type A HMA |
| The quantity of what the sample constitutes | JMF Verification | From where was the sample collected | Manufacturer |
| First name of sampler or witnessed by | Cindy | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Bryant |
| Title of sampler | TET | Telephone number of sampler | |
| Laboratory sample identification | D79009F | Linked DIME Sample ID | 2022-03-17-22, 2022-03-17-23, 2022-03-17-24 |
| The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Tullis – Northstate Asphalt (Redding, CA) | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 708110 |
| Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
| Structure name | Bid Item | Not set |
Material Information
| Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | 91-45-0057::Shasta Ranch Aggregates |
|---|---|---|---|
| The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||
| The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Lab-Batched from Sized Untreated Aggregate Stockpiles | |
| Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 3/4 inch | |
| The concrete mix design number | JMF 22-01-S01 | Lot number | |
| Sublot number | Aggregate Mix Number | Not set |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2022-03-17-25
DIME Test ID: 2022-03-17-25-10
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2022-05-12
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Karen Dorado
Date of test: 03/30/2022
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 11 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 25.3 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 21 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 0 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 418.9 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 8.4 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 241.5 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 9.7 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 119.1 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 3 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 97 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 8 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 92 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 4 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 96 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 5/12/2022 ✔
