Summary for Test 2020-10-29-29-10

Test performed: ASTM D4791-10

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 214515
DEA: 024F6004
EFIS: 0213000012
DIST-CO-RTE-PM02-SIS,TRI-36,96,299-VAR
Award Date01/14/2020
Closeout Date08/24/2022
Work DescriptionBRIDGE DECK REPAIR, POLYESTER OVERLAY AND RAIL REPLACEMENT.
Location DescriptionSISKIYOU AND TRINITY COUNTIES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 01/22/2020)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date10/29/2020 Sample Unique Key29
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing10/29/2020 Sample typeVerification
A brief description of the sample1/2-inch Type A Untreated Virgin Aggreagte The quantity of what the sample constitutesJMF Verification
From where was the sample collectedSource First name of sampler or witnessed byNRML
Last name of sampler or witnessed byRedding Title of sampler
Telephone number of sampler Laboratory sample identificationD78689F
Linked DIME Sample ID The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameMercer-Fraser Company, Willow Creek Plant
Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number853340 Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form
Structure unique identifier Structure name
Bid ItemNot set

Material Information

Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site)91-12-0007
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample
The plant number A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedLab-Batched from Sized Untreated Aggregate Stockpiles
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled Primary Aggregate Nominal Size1/2 inch
The concrete mix design numberJMF 20-11-S3 Lot number
Sublot number Aggregate Mix NumberNot set

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2020-10-29-29
DIME Test ID: 2020-10-29-29-10
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2021-04-02

Test Results


Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles

Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Karen Rios Dorado
Date of test: 12/15/2020
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 12.3 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 26.5 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 13.5 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1.2 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 251.2 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 3.5 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 61.1 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 3.1 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 23.2 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 5 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 95 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 12 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 88 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 6 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 94 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 4/2/2021 ✔