Summary for Test 2020-05-22-25-11
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
| Project Identifiers | Project ID: 212866 DEA: 021H9704 EFIS: 0216000051 |
|---|---|
| DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 02-TEH-36-12.6/13.1 |
| Award Date | 11/25/2019 |
| Closeout Date | 10/06/2020 |
| Work Description | CURVE REALIGNMENT AND HMA PAVING. |
| Location Description | TEHAMA COUNTY ABOUT 16 MILES EAST OF PLATINA FROM 2.3 MILES EAST TO 2.8 MILES EAST OF DRY CREEK BRIDGE |
| QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 01/08/2019) |
Sample Information
| Sample Taken Date | 05/22/2020 | Sample Unique Key | 25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 05/22/2020 |
| Sample type | Verification | A brief description of the sample | Combined Untreated 1/2-inch Type G Aggregate |
| The quantity of what the sample constitutes | JMF Verification | From where was the sample collected | Source |
| First name of sampler or witnessed by | Karen | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Spliethof |
| Title of sampler | Telephone number of sampler | ||
| Laboratory sample identification | D78446F | Linked DIME Sample ID | |
| The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Shasta Ranch Aggregates - Anderson, CA | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 897709 |
| Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
| Structure name |
Material Information
| Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | 91-45-0057 |
|---|---|---|---|
| The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||
| The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Lab-Batched from Sized Untreated Aggregate Stockpiles | |
| Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 1/2 inch | |
| The concrete mix design number | JMF 20-10-S1 | Lot number | |
| Sublot number | Aggregate Mix Number | Not set |
Test Details
Test Details QR Code
Scan this code to open this Test Details view on another device.
Sample Details QR Code
Scan this code to open this Sample Details view on another device.
DIME Sample ID: 2020-05-22-25
DIME Test ID: 2020-05-22-25-11
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2020-07-23
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Ward Jenkins
Date of test: 07/22/2020
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 11 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 29.7 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 15.9 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 200.8 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 5.4 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 63.2 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 5.5 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 29.5 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 8 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 92 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 16 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 84 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 9 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 91 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 7/23/2020 ✔