Summary for Test 2019-07-11-20-10
Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 214337 DEA: 080E33U4 EFIS: 0817000075 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 08-SBD-115-R7.3/R10.0 |
Award Date | 04/26/2021 |
Closeout Date | Not set |
Work Description | ADD WB AUX & EB DECEL LANES, WIDEN I15 SW CONNECT,RAMPS/BRDG |
Location Description | SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY IN ONTARIO FROM 0.2 MILE WEST OF CUCAMONGA CREEK BRIDGE TO MILLIKEN AVENUE |
QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 06/23/2021) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 07/11/2019 | Sample Unique Key | 20 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 07/11/2019 |
Sample type | Per Request | A brief description of the sample | Soil |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | 1 bag | From where was the sample collected | Job Site |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | Jose | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Guzman |
Title of sampler | MREA | Telephone number of sampler | 909-829-6292 |
Laboratory sample identification | 8645 | Linked DIME Sample ID | |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Caltrans | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 8645 |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
Structure name |
Material Information
Material Type | Soil | The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | Unknown |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | Unknown | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | A-19-008 |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Unknown |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2019-07-11-20
DIME Test ID: 2019-07-11-20-10
Testing Lab: CT D08 - Fontana Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2019-09-13
Test Results
How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Tess Perez
Date of test: 07/24/2019
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 99 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 97 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 97 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 95 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 93 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 90 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 82 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 65 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 41 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 22 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 99 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 97 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 97 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 95 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 93 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 90 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 82 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 65 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 41 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 22 %
R value: 66
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 9/13/2019 ✔