Summary for Test 2019-06-17-14-10

Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 213388
DEA: 120N3004
EFIS: 1213000194
DIST-CO-RTE-PM12-ORA-241-18.3/18.7
Award Date09/26/2018
Closeout Date12/09/2019
Work DescriptionRAMP REALIGNMENT, PAVING, AND RE-STRIPING.
Location DescriptionORANGE COUNTY IN RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA FROM 0.2 MILE SOUTH TO 0.2 MILE NORTH OF SANTA MARGARITA PARKWAY OVERCROSSING
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 04/16/2019)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date06/17/2019 Sample Unique Key14
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing06/19/2019
Sample typePer Request A brief description of the sampleClass 2 Agg Base
The quantity of what the sample constitutes1 bag From where was the sample collectedJob Site
First name of sampler or witnessed byDan Last name of sampler or witnessed byMorris
Title of sampler Telephone number of sampler
Laboratory sample identification8614 Linked DIME Sample ID
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameCaltrans Transportation Laboratory (TL) NumberC 648388
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifier
Structure name

Material Information

Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)Unknown
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sampleUnknown The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sampleUnknown
The plant numberUnknown A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedRte 241
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledUnknown Primary Aggregate Nominal Size3/4 inch
The concrete mix design numberUnknown Lot numberUnknown
Sublot numberUnknown HMA Design ID

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2019-06-17-14
DIME Test ID: 2019-06-17-14-10
Testing Lab: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2019-07-03

Test Results


How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Tess Perez/Kiet Phan
Date of test: 06/25/2019
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 96 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 77 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 68 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 49 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 39 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 30 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 23 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 16 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 12 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 8.8 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 96 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 77 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 68 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 49 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 39 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 30 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 23 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 16 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 12 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 8.8 %
R value:78
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 7/3/2019