Summary for Test 2024-10-08-115-3
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
| Project Identifiers | Project ID: 66667 DEA: JMFPP EFIS: 0019000043 |
|---|---|
| DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 59--- |
| Award Date | Not set |
| Closeout Date | Not set |
| Work Description | Special project for submitting Sample information for JMF Prequalification Program. |
| Location Description | Not set |
| QA Service Level | NOT VERIFIED |
Sample Information
| Sample Taken Date | 10/08/2024 | Sample Unique Key | 115 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 10/08/2024 |
| Sample type | Verification | A brief description of the sample | JMF |
| The quantity of what the sample constitutes | 9 bags | From where was the sample collected | Source |
| First name of sampler or witnessed by | Ben | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Smith |
| Title of sampler | Telephone number of sampler | ||
| Laboratory sample identification | 7001-JMF | Linked DIME Sample ID | 2024-10-08-114 |
| The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Martin Marietta | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | |
| Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
| Structure name |
Material Information
| Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | Not Provided |
|---|---|---|---|
| The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||
| The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Plnat | |
| Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 3/4 inch | |
| The concrete mix design number | Lot number | ||
| Sublot number | Aggregate Mix Number | 23417105 MM |
Test Details
Test Details QR Code
Scan this code to open this Test Details view on another device.
Sample Details QR Code
Scan this code to open this Sample Details view on another device.
DIME Sample ID: 2024-10-08-115
DIME Test ID: 2024-10-08-115-3
Testing Lab: CT D11 - District 11 Materials Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2024-11-25
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Number
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Shawn Rivers
Date of test: 11/18/2024
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 0 %
Number of 6 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 6 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 5 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 5 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 4 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 3 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 2 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of 1 inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ¾ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ¾ inch that were not flat and elongated: 100 particles
Number of ½ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ½ inch that were not flat and elongated: 100 particles
Number of ⅜ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ⅜ inch that were not flat and elongated: 100 particles
Number of ¼ inch that were flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of ¼ inch that were not flat and elongated: 0 particles
Number of No. 4 that were flat and elongated: 2 particles
Number of No. 4 that were not flat and elongated: 98 particles
Percentage (by number) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by number) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by number) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by number) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by number) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 2 %
Percentage (by number) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 98 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by number) that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by number) that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 11/25/2024 ✔