Summary for Test 2019-08-15-20-8
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 213469 DEA: 024C40V4 EFIS: 0218000125 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 02-SHA-5-R3.8/R11.7 |
Award Date | 11/06/2018 |
Closeout Date | 08/16/2023 |
Work Description | WIDEN TO 6 LANES, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND WIDENING AND ROADWAY REHAB |
Location Description | SHASTA COUNTY IN AND NEAR ANDERSON FROM ROUTE 5/273 SEPARATION TO 0.4 MILE SOUTH OF CHURN CREEK ROAD OVERCROSSING |
QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 12/31/2018) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 08/15/2019 | Sample Unique Key | 20 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 08/15/2019 |
Sample type | Verification | A brief description of the sample | Combined Untreated 3/4-inch Type G Aggregate |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | JMF Verification | From where was the sample collected | Source |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | Mark | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Mahoney |
Title of sampler | Consultant | Telephone number of sampler | |
Laboratory sample identification | D78105F | Linked DIME Sample ID | |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | JF Shea Construction - Fawndale Rock Quarry - Redding | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 898330 |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
Structure name |
Material Information
Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | 91-45-0017 |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||
The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Laboratory Batched from Sized Untreated Stockpile Samples | |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 3/4 inch | |
The concrete mix design number | JMF 19-26-S1 | Lot number | |
Sublot number | Aggregate Mix Number | Not set |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2019-08-15-20
DIME Test ID: 2019-08-15-20-8
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2021-12-14
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Dennis Hickey
Date of test: 08/29/2019
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 21.5 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 14.6 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 18.7 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 28.4 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 3.6 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 558.5 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1.8 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 221 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 2.5 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 72.2 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0.9 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 27.5 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 99 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 99 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 3 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 97 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 3 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 97 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 2 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 98 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 12/14/2021 ✔