Summary for Test 2021-06-14-43-7
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 215250 DEA: 021J4404 EFIS: 0220000079 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 02-MOD-299-20.0/23.1,23.5/24.5,33.5/37.5 |
Award Date | 12/14/2020 |
Closeout Date | 09/27/2021 |
Work Description | ASPHALT RUBBER CHIP SEAL. |
Location Description | MODOC COUNTY AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS FROM 1.8 MILES WEST OF ROUTE 139 TO 0.3 MILE WEST OF RATTLESNAKE CREEK BRIDGE |
QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 10/30/2020) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 06/14/2021 | Sample Unique Key | 43 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 06/22/2021 |
Sample type | Acceptance | A brief description of the sample | 1 bag of Uncoated 3/8″ Aggregate for use in ARB Chip Seal |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | 1/2 day to whole project | From where was the sample collected | Other |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | Cindy | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Bryant |
Title of sampler | TET | Telephone number of sampler | |
Laboratory sample identification | D78852 | Linked DIME Sample ID | |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Eagle Peak Rock and Paving, Alturas, CA | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 853350 |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
Structure name |
Material Information
Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | Eagle Peak |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | Unknown | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | Unknown |
The plant number | Unknown | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Unknown |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | 02 MOD 299 | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 1/2 inch |
The concrete mix design number | Not Applicable | Lot number | Unknown |
Sublot number | Unknown | Aggregate Mix Number | Not set |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2021-06-14-43
DIME Test ID: 2021-06-14-43-7
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2022-01-28
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 3:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Dennis Hickey
Date of test: 07/08/2021
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 12 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 51.2 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 25 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 6.9 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 221.6 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 10.1 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 91.4 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 7.3 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 25.4 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 3 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 97 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 10 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 90 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 22 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 78 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 12 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 88 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 1/28/2022 ✔