Summary for Test 2021-02-24-23-3
Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 215676 DEA: 020J6404 EFIS: 0219000145 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 02-PLU-36-R13.6/R14.2 |
Award Date | 12/19/2023 |
Closeout Date | Not set |
Work Description | A13 AT ROUTE 36 SAFETY |
Location Description | IN PLUMAS COUNTY NEAR CHESTER FROM 0.2 MILE WEST OF BAILEY CREEK BRIDGE TO 0.3 MILE EAST OF COUNTY ROAD A-13. |
QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 07/08/2021) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 02/24/2021 | Sample Unique Key | 23 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 02/24/2021 |
Sample type | Preliminary | A brief description of the sample | Soil |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | Structural Section Recomendation | From where was the sample collected | Job Site |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | Brian | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Steiner |
Title of sampler | Telephone number of sampler | ||
Laboratory sample identification | D78747 | Linked DIME Sample ID | |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | In Situ | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 824581 |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
Structure name |
Material Information
Material Type | Soil | The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | 02-PLU-36-13.8, Shoulder Slope, 6 to 12-inch Depth | |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2021-02-24-23
DIME Test ID: 2021-02-24-23-3
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2021-04-09
Test Results
How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Dennis Hickey
Date of test: 03/05/2021
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 98 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 96 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 95 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 92 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 90 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 81 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 71 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 62 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 53 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 45 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 36 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 29 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 96 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 94 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 83 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 73 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 64 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 55 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 46 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 37 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 30 %
R value: 73
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 4/9/2021 ✔