Summary for Test 2020-06-04-31-9

Test performed: ASTM D4791-10

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 214571
DEA: 020J1104
EFIS: 0219000062
DIST-CO-RTE-PM02-PLU-70-33.1/42.1
Award Date02/07/2020
Closeout Date04/27/2021
Work DescriptionPLACE HMA & SHOULDER BACKING, & REMOVE & REPLACE PAVEMENT DELINEATION.
Location DescriptionPLUMAS COUNTY AT AND NEAR KEDDIE FROM INDIAN CREEK BRIDGE TO 0.3 MILE WEST OF SPANISH CREEK BRIDGE NO. 09-0018
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 01/22/2020)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date06/04/2020 Sample Unique Key31
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing06/05/2020
Sample typeVerification A brief description of the sample3/4-inch Untreated Virgin Type A Aggregate
The quantity of what the sample constitutesJMF Verification From where was the sample collectedSource
First name of sampler or witnessed byPEI Last name of sampler or witnessed byPEI
Title of sampler Telephone number of sampler
Laboratory sample identificationD78458F Linked DIME Sample ID
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameSierra Cascade Aggregate and Asphalt Products Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number733199
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifier
Structure name

Material Information

Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site)91-32-0002
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample
The plant number A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedLab-Batched from Sized Untreated Aggregate Stockpiles
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled Primary Aggregate Nominal Size3/4 inch
The concrete mix design numberJMF 20-07-S1 Lot number
Sublot number Aggregate Mix NumberNot set

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2020-06-04-31
DIME Test ID: 2020-06-04-31-9
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2020-08-20

Test Results


Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles

Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 5:1
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Dennis Hickey
Date of test: 08/17/2020
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 20.5 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 9.7 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 11.1 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 0 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 570.5 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1.1 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 192.4 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 2.3 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 68.5 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 99 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 3 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 97 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 1 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 99 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 8/20/2020