Summary for Test 2020-06-03-34-1

Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 212866
DEA: 021H9704
EFIS: 0216000051
DIST-CO-RTE-PM02-TEH-36-12.6/13.1
Award Date11/25/2019
Closeout Date10/06/2020
Work DescriptionCURVE REALIGNMENT AND HMA PAVING.
Location DescriptionTEHAMA COUNTY ABOUT 16 MILES EAST OF PLATINA FROM 2.3 MILES EAST TO 2.8 MILES EAST OF DRY CREEK BRIDGE
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 01/08/2019)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date06/03/2020 Sample Unique Key34
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing06/03/2020
Sample typeQuality Assurance A brief description of the sample34/" Class II AB
The quantity of what the sample constitutesnot provided From where was the sample collectedJob Site
First name of sampler or witnessed byDavid Last name of sampler or witnessed byLockett
Title of sampler Telephone number of sampler
Laboratory sample identificationD78455 Linked DIME Sample ID
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameNot Provided Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number002339
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifier
Structure name

Material Information

Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)Tullis
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample
The plant number A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedStructural Section
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled Primary Aggregate Nominal Size3/4 inch
The concrete mix design number Lot number
Sublot number HMA Design ID

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2020-06-03-34
DIME Test ID: 2020-06-03-34-1
Testing Lab: CT D02 - North Region Materials Lab
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2020-08-19

Test Results


How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Terry McCormick
Date of test: 06/03/2020
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 97 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 74 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 62 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 43 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 31 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 22 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 15 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 11 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 8 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 6 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 76 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 64 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 43 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 31 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 22 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 15 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 11 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 8 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 6 %
R value:79
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 8/19/2020