Summary for Test 2020-02-25-11-2

Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 214180
DEA: 051C9804
EFIS: 0513000021
DIST-CO-RTE-PM05-MON,SCR-1,129,152-Var
Award Date08/26/2019
Closeout Date08/23/2021
Work DescriptionMon Scr Roadside Safety. PAVE GORE AREAS, MAINTENANCE VEHICLE PULLOUTS AND UPGRADE GUARDRAIL.
Location DescriptionMONTEREY AND SANTA CRUZ COUNTIES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 09/30/2019)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date02/25/2020 Sample Unique Key11
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?No Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing03/27/2020
Sample typePreliminary A brief description of the sampleTwo Bags 3/4" CL II AB
The quantity of what the sample constitutesPreliminary From where was the sample collectedJob Site
First name of sampler or witnessed byWesley Last name of sampler or witnessed byRider
Title of sampler Telephone number of sampler
Laboratory sample identificationD5 20-C-005 Linked DIME Sample ID
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameDon Chapin Hollister Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifier
Structure name

Material Information

Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site)Unknown
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample
The plant number A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedStockpile
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled Primary Aggregate Nominal Size3/4 inch
The concrete mix design number Lot number
Sublot number Aggregate Mix NumberNot set

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2020-02-25-11
DIME Test ID: 2020-02-25-11-2
Testing Lab: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2020-03-11

Test Results


How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Daniel Gingras
Date of test: 03/11/2020
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 95 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 78 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 68 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 44 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 82 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 69 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 46 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 0 %
R value: 82
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 3/11/2020