Summary for Test 2020-03-09-3-1

Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000

Project Information

Project IdentifiersProject ID: 211235
DEA: 054482U4
EFIS: 0500000543
DIST-CO-RTE-PM05-SB-101-2.2/3.3
Award Date06/20/2016
Closeout Date08/23/2021
Work DescriptionBUILD AND RECONSTRUCT BRIDGES, CONSTRUCT RAMPS AND FRONTAGE ROAD.
Location DescriptionSANTA BARBARA COUNTY IN CARPINTERIA FROM 0.2 MILE SOUTH OF CARPINTERIA CREEK BRIDGE TO FRANKLIN CREEK BRIDGE
QA Service Level1 (Verified on 07/27/2016)

Sample Information

Sample Taken Date03/09/2020 Sample Unique Key3
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing03/09/2020
Sample typeAcceptance A brief description of the sample3/4" CL II AB, Recycled
The quantity of what the sample constitutesUnknown From where was the sample collectedManufacturer
First name of sampler or witnessed byDarren Last name of sampler or witnessed byLaChaine
Title of sampler Telephone number of sampler
Laboratory sample identificationD5 20-C-008 Linked DIME Sample ID
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameSecurity Paving Crushing Goleta Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifier
Structure name

Material Information

Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)Unknown
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sampleUnknown The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sampleUnknown
The plant numberUnknown A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedUnknown
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledUnknown Primary Aggregate Nominal Size3/4 inch
The concrete mix design numberUnknown Lot numberUnknown
Sublot numberUnknown HMA Design ID

Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2020-03-09-3
DIME Test ID: 2020-03-09-3-1
Testing Lab: CT D05 - Field Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2020-03-11

Test Results


How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Daniel Gingras
Date of test: 03/11/2020
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 98 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 82 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 72 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 54 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 84 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 73 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 55 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 0 %
R value:81
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 3/11/2020