Test 2020-02-24-27-1 (CTM 301-March 2000) Summary

Project Information
Project IdentifiersProject ID: 213835
DEA: 051F7404
EFIS: 0514000049
DIST-CO-RTE-PM05-MON-101-R28.0/R30.6
Work DescriptionPLACE CONTINUOUSLY REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT ON EXISTING ROADWAY.
Location DescriptionMONTEREY COUNTY NEAR SAN LUCAS FROM 0.1 MILE SOUTH OF PARIS VALLEY ROAD OVERCROSSING TO RANCHO UNDERCROSSING
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date2/24/2020 Sample Unique Key27
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing2/26/2020
Sample typeAcceptance A brief description of the sampleClass I ASB from Crusher
The quantity of what the sample constitutes2 bags From where was the sample collectedJob Site
First name of sampler or witnessed byBrandon Last name of sampler or witnessed byWood
Title of samplerField Technician Laboratory sample identificationD5 20-C-003
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility namePapich Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifier
Structure name
Material Information
Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)Unknown
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sampleUnknown The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sampleUnknown
The plant numberUnknown A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedJobsite Crusher
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledUnknown Primary Aggregate Nominal Size1 inch
The concrete mix design numberUnknown Lot numberUnknown
Sublot numberUnknown HMA Design ID
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2020-02-24-27
DIME Test ID: 2020-02-24-27-1
Testing Lab: CT D05 - Field Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method of Test for Determining the Resistance "R"; Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2020-02-28
Test Results

How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Daniel Gingras
Date of test: 02/28/2020
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 93 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 85 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 75 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 70 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 57 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 0 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 88 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 82 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 67 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 0 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 0 %
R value:79
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 02/28/2020